Kicking off discussion for Integration bounties

[Meertitan]

Good points all around

@DioDionysos

I am worried that our partners would not like being put into “low tier”. When naming these tiers let us maybe think about it as priority based and make sure that it can not be considered as a grading for a certain protocol.

Hard agree, a lot of protocols would probably find it very disrespectful to be put into a low tier. No need to cause any bad feelings or hostility.

@arcology

The ‘tiering’ be replaced by size based on TVL (you probably want to reach larger projects first so that self-organizes as priorities);

This sounds like a good approach tbh, I’ll definitely keep it in mind.

@GrantG

Building on the bounty board idea, why not utilize that structure to call upon tribes to form, to solve problems? IE. A bounty is posted regarding marketing for < x > protocol. From there multiple different Tribes can bid upon the contract/bounty, and submit their plans to the community at large for a vote to determine who receives the contract. I realize this is somewhat antithetical to the ethos of this prop, but I cant shake the feeling that cutting the community loose w/o structure is dangerous.

This might be the best option, calling back to this post here Partnership Program: Tribes - #18 by GrantG . We could have a central coordinating group, managing the different bounty groups. As Dio and I already proposed a similar idea, we would be willing to fill that position.

What we need to avoid at all costs is a hoard of Tribe members spamming various projects with no quality control. That could lead to a really bad image for Fei Protocol.