girls & guys,
Please let the nature do his thing and also this great system work. Be patient do not eat up things that belong to you. SO therefore NO CHANGE is the only option.
Please be smart!
Invested because I believed in the incentive system in combination with it’s PCV concept.
That is Y we Bought it no point of questioning your own decision hence No Change in the system is required.
I would like to give a chance for system to stabilize and work efficiently. which i have no doubt
hence i vote “No Changes”
Stop creating new accounts and spamming. We can see your account age. Account created 6 minutes ago.
3 Likes
Why am I not allowed to add my opinion? I’m also a Tribe holder and I just voted!
I agree, I think we should be focusing on moving forwards with the project.
So i vote NO CHANGE!!!
1 Like
ANOTHER brand new account and using the same bold NO CHANGE writing.
It’s so obvious you’re all the same person.
1 Like
Nah it’s the same person. If you click their name, it says when they registered, and how long they’ve been in the thread for. Some of them were in the thread for 1 minute or less. That’s not even enough time to read the 1st post.
I preswapped to TRIBE also, and I voted for $1.00. It’s the best option. It’s not a bailout, it’s meant to be a stablecoin, and if it isn’t then it will hurt TRIBE also.
1 Like
No Change! Do not reward the Apes!
1 Like
Definitely No Change !! Stick to the system and what it’s supposed to do eventhough it takes time. No bailing and easy way out for those trying to have quick profit from the project. All is in the same boat
Presumably, the apes have mostly sold their free TRIBE already - and in voting ‘no change’, their FEI can remain captive for a while - till the peg is reached one way or another; this mostly only delays what the team is trying to get done for the project.
Here is an argument and analogy for no changers:
I buy stuff from amazon and I can return anytime. Amazon didn’t have to do it, they could have just told me to go f- myself and keep the money. They do allow return, even if it’s my own fault, why? Because that will retain the customer and keep having them coming back to buy more. Amazon wouldn’t have been Amazon without good customer service.
People would not come back to use FEI later if they experienced something like this now. This is a business, a business of offering stable coin, and if the coin doesn’t work so well, just refund the customer and make it better.
I’ll probably sell my TRIBE if “no change” passes because I wouldn’t see this as a good investment anymore.
5 Likes
Noone is being held hostage. Fei holders can go ahead and sell, no problem. Why are investors asking (no demanding) to be made whole. You made the trade, now live with the consequences. Comparing a retailer and their customer service with an investment trade is ridiculous.
Someone with some sense, please jump in here. I feel like I am losing my mind with the level of discourse on this trade.
3 Likes
FEI is not an investment. a stable coin is a service/commodity. people buy a stable coin expecting a certain service (that it stays at $1). Who would buy stable coin as investment? Hoping that USDC will go from 1 to 1.001 in a year and make 0.1% return?
People are outraged because they are got stuck with a defective product, and rightfully so. The right thing is to refund them.
In fact, if people got refunded this time, and in the future they are much more likely to return, to buy FEI and use FEI. when they buy FEI, that money goes to PCV, and that’s the right way of accumulating PCV.
This is exactly like a retailer. It’s a stable coin shop.
7 Likes
Maybe, I just created my account to vote. I did not need to do that earlier.
This sum it all. I’ll support this.
If anyone want quick money, they need to go through the system.
I didn’t see the refund proposal though.
A redemption of $0.9 is the best
1 Like
It’s going to $1 just a bit slower. You also got free tribe.
jane you’ve been one of the maybe 3 thoughtful responders in this thread
the primary issue here is the founders don’t seem to think like traders and repeatedly open up the protocol to arbitrage
a $1 redemption with no genesis condition will be an exact replay of the reweight() snafu
poor communication, poor understanding of the dark forest
4 Likes
Hello,
Why are we even discussing this??
A big part of crypto is being responsible for your own decisions. You are putting money at risk when you transfer to something new!!! RISK and NEW can mean profit but also loss or delay or not meeting expectations. That just how it works…
The amazon and retail argument just doesn’t holp up. It’s more like financing amazon when they just had an idea and when their website in the first launch has a glitch you demand your money back because it’s not working like it supposed to.
I can not imagine that the problem is that people were expecting a working stablecoin, people were expecting quick profits. (nothing wrong with that, just didn’t happen this time)
No change for me
3 Likes